| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 71 | |
| 44. |  | CAZZULI, F.; FERREIRA-CHAVES, E.; DE HEGEDÜS, P.; TOMMASINO, H.; BERTOLLINI, J.; BRUNEL, M.; DUARTE, P.; FERNANDEZ, A.; RODRIGUEZ, H.; SAYES, J.; SEIJO, G. Metodología de trabajo y funcionamiento de la Mesa de Desarrollo de Laureles-Cañas (Tacuarembó): Un estudio de caso. Revista Estudios Cooperativos, 2011, v. 16, n. 2, p. 42-61.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|    |
| 48. | | MONTOSSI, F.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; BRITO, G.; CAZZULI, F.; BERRETTA, E. Productivity and economic impact of the diferent technological strategies designed for extensive livestock production of the basaltic region of Uruguay: cow-calf subsystem. In: International Conference: Steps to Sustainable Livestock, University of Bristol, England, UK, 12th-15th January, 2016. Abstract. p. 94.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 49. | | MONTOSSI, F.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; BRITO, G.; CAZZULI, F.; BERRETTA, E. Productivity impact of the different technological strategies designed for livestock production in the basaltic region of Uruguay: rearing and fattening sub systems. In: International Conference: Steps to Sustainable Livestock, University of Bristol, England, UK, 12th-15th January, 2016. Abstract. p. 95.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 51. | | NÚÑEZ, L.; HIRIGOYEN, A.; DURANTE, M.; ARROYO, J.; CAZZULI, F.; BREMM, C.; JAURENA, M. Qué factores controlan la proteína del forraje del campo natural?. Pasturas. Revista INIA Uruguay, Setiembre 2022, no.70, p.43-46. (Revista INIA; 70).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 60. | | CAZZULI, F.; LAGOMARSINO, X.; MONTOSSI, F. Self-feeding beef calves on basaltic deferred nativa grasslands of Uruguay had similar animal performance than daily supplementation. [Resumen]. In: Jornada NESPro, 12., Simpósio Internacional sobre Sistemas de Produção de Bovinos de Corte, 3.,26-28 setiembre, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 71 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
27/04/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/04/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
SIMEONE, M.; GÓMEZ, C.; BERTALMIO, A.; RUIZ, E.; HAUTEVILLE, C.; GODOY, L.; TITO, B.; GARCÍA, M.L. |
|
Afiliación : |
MELINA SIMEONE, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, CCT-La Plata CONICET-UNLP Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina; CLAUDIO GÓMEZ, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Entre Ríos, Argentina; ANA MARIA BERTALMIO CASARIEGO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ESPERANZA RUIZ, Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina; CLAUDIA HAUTEVILLE, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Entre Ríos, Argentina; LAURA GODOY SUÁREZ, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Entre Ríos, Argentina; BLAS TITO, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Entre Ríos, Argentina; MARÍA L. GARCÍA, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, CCT?La Plata CONICET?UNLP Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
Detection of citrus psorosis virus by RT‐qPCR validated by diagnostic parameters. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Plant Pathology, May 2021, Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 980-986. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13341 |
|
ISSN : |
0032-0862 |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/ppa.13341 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received, 8 September 2020; Accepted, 28 December 2020, First published, 18 January 2021.
This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCYT) PICT 2014‐1007 and PICT Start UP 2014‐3762, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Proyectos de Investigación de Unidades Ejecutoras?(IBBM), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) X‐692, and Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) (PNFRU‐1172; 11721; ERIOS‐630081, PD I081 and RIST I091). M.S. was supported by ANPCyT and CONICET. M.L.G. belongs to CONICET and Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP. We thank Beatriz Stein and Julia Figueroa from the Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEOC), Tucumán, for providing samples from their collection and Magalí Gabrielli for technical assistance in the total RNA extractions. We thank Pedro Moreno for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Citrus psorosis virus (CPsV) is the causal agent of psorosis, an important disease of citrus. Sanitary and certification programmes helped reduce disease damage caused by psorosis and other graft‐transmissible diseases in many citrus‐growing regions. For quarantine and certification programmes, most of these diseases are currently diagnosed using biological indexing (BI) on sensitive indicator plants. In the case of citrus psorosis, CPsV can be detected by molecular methods such as quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐qPCR), which is cheaper and faster than BI, but sensitivity, reliability, and reproducibility of both procedures have not been compared so far. In this work, 128 plants from Argentina and Uruguay were analysed using BI and CPsV detection by the RT‐qPCR assay. Almost perfect agreement between both diagnostic procedures and sensitivity, specificity, and estimated likelihood ratios indicate that RT‐qPCR is equivalent to BI for citrus psorosis diagnosis, thus providing confidence in the quick diagnostic procedure to monitor the sanitary status of citrus trees.
© 2021 British Society for Plant Pathology |
|
Palabras claves : |
Citrus psorosis virus; Diagnostic parameters; RT-qPCR. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03027naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1061995
005 2021-04-27
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0032-0862
024 7 $a10.1111/ppa.13341$2DOI
100 1 $aSIMEONE, M.
245 $aDetection of citrus psorosis virus by RT‐qPCR validated by diagnostic parameters.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received, 8 September 2020; Accepted, 28 December 2020, First published, 18 January 2021. This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCYT) PICT 2014‐1007 and PICT Start UP 2014‐3762, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Proyectos de Investigación de Unidades Ejecutoras?(IBBM), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) X‐692, and Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) (PNFRU‐1172; 11721; ERIOS‐630081, PD I081 and RIST I091). M.S. was supported by ANPCyT and CONICET. M.L.G. belongs to CONICET and Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, UNLP. We thank Beatriz Stein and Julia Figueroa from the Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEOC), Tucumán, for providing samples from their collection and Magalí Gabrielli for technical assistance in the total RNA extractions. We thank Pedro Moreno for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.
520 $aABSTRACT. Citrus psorosis virus (CPsV) is the causal agent of psorosis, an important disease of citrus. Sanitary and certification programmes helped reduce disease damage caused by psorosis and other graft‐transmissible diseases in many citrus‐growing regions. For quarantine and certification programmes, most of these diseases are currently diagnosed using biological indexing (BI) on sensitive indicator plants. In the case of citrus psorosis, CPsV can be detected by molecular methods such as quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐qPCR), which is cheaper and faster than BI, but sensitivity, reliability, and reproducibility of both procedures have not been compared so far. In this work, 128 plants from Argentina and Uruguay were analysed using BI and CPsV detection by the RT‐qPCR assay. Almost perfect agreement between both diagnostic procedures and sensitivity, specificity, and estimated likelihood ratios indicate that RT‐qPCR is equivalent to BI for citrus psorosis diagnosis, thus providing confidence in the quick diagnostic procedure to monitor the sanitary status of citrus trees. © 2021 British Society for Plant Pathology
653 $aCitrus psorosis virus
653 $aDiagnostic parameters
653 $aRT-qPCR
700 1 $aGÓMEZ, C.
700 1 $aBERTALMIO, A.
700 1 $aRUIZ, E.
700 1 $aHAUTEVILLE, C.
700 1 $aGODOY, L.
700 1 $aTITO, B.
700 1 $aGARCÍA, M.L.
773 $tPlant Pathology, May 2021, Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 980-986. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13341
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
